If Harry and Meghan try to damage the Crown's image, King Charles will display his "ruthless side," as the saying goes.  Royal expert

SYNOPSIS

According to the Royal expert, "this is not good for Harry and Meghan."

According to Royal expert Katie Nicholl, if the Netflix documentary series makes incorrect assertions about the Royal Family, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle might lose their titles as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Vanity Fair's Royal Editor predicts that King Charles will not hold back and that the Sussex family, including Archie and Lilibet, may lose their titles.

The documentary airing Harry and Meghan's "love tale" has been pushed back from its original November premiere to 2023. According to Nicholl, Netflix has been "rattled" by the backlash against The Crown Season 5, the release of which comes only weeks after the death of Queen Elizabeth II.

Nicholl claims that the media outrage over the new series scared Netflix into cancelling The Crown Season 5 before it premiered because some of the plots are "so near to the bone." "possible harm to the royal family.

For Harry and Meghan, this is a bad sign, "Nicholl explained to GB News that this is why a partnership with Netflix worth $100 million is crucial. Earlier rumours stated that Harry had delayed the release of his memoir to clarify his comments regarding the Royal Family in the wake of the death of Queen Elizabeth II. There have been rumblings that Netflix's documentary, initially scheduled for release in 2023, may be delayed indefinitely.

Nicholl thinks Harry and Meghan were very self-aware when they returned to London for the funeral rituals for the Queen and realised that many of the statements made in Harry's book and the documentary series "might sound quite insensitive so soon after The Queen's death."

Even while Nicholl believes Harry and Meghan are not hesitant to criticise the Royal Family, he emphasises that "time is crucial." ". Her contacts say that if something like this occurs at the moment, people should expect to witness "the merciless side of things." "of King Charles the Third. He would not sit on his hands and allow The Crown's honour to be sullied.

The Royal expert feels it's no accident that Archie and Lilibet haven't been given any titles yet, as Harry and Meghan have to win the faith and respect of the public before they can enjoy the luxury themselves. If Harry and Meghan strive to harm the "institution's" reputation, their legitimacy as royals could be called into question ".

Shehan Karunatilaka, a Sri Lank writer, was awarded the Booker Prize in 2022.

For winning the Booker Prize for Fiction in 2022 with "The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida," Shehan Karunatilaka received a trophy from Queen Camilla of the United Kingdom on October 17, 2022, in London, Britain. "— Reuters.

LONDON: The second novel by Sri Lankan author Shehan Karunatilaka, "The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida," won the Booker Prize on Monday. The narrative follows a deceased war photographer on a mission in the afterlife.

Karunatilaka was honoured during the first in-person presentation for the English language literary award since 2019. As a bonus, he will also receive a prize of 50,000 pounds ($56,810).

Karunatilaka's story follows Maali Almeida, a gay war photographer and gambler when he wakes up dead in 1990 Sri Lanka during the country's civil conflict.

Maali has "seven moons" to contact his family and friends and lead them to his concealed images documenting the cruelty of the battle in his nation.

In his award speech, Karunatilaka remarked, "My aim for 'Seven Moons' is that in the not too distant future... it is read in a Sri Lanka that has learned that these ideals of corruption, race-baiting, and cronyism have not worked and will never work."

"Seven Moons" will be found in the fantasy area of the bookstore, not the realist or political satire section, and "I hope it is read in a Sri Lanka that learns from its stories."

Among the works up for the Booker Prize, this year were "Treacle Walker" by British author Alan Garner, "Glory" by Zimbabwean author NoViolet Bulawayo, "Small Things Like These" by Irish writer Claire Keegan, "The Trees" by American author Percival Everett, and "Oh William!" by American author Elizabeth Strout.

According to Neil MacGregor, who presided over the judging process, "This is a metaphysical thriller, an afterlife noir that breaks the borders not only of different genres, but of life and death, body and spirit, east and west."

MacGregor further called it "an entirely serious intellectual adventure" that transported readers to "the world's dark heart," the terrible horrors of civil war in Sri Lanka. And once the reader arrives, they will find kindness and beauty, love and loyalty, and the pursuit of an ideal that justifies every human life.

Booker Prize winners from the past include such luminaries as Margaret Atwood, Salman Rushdie, and Yann Martel.

William revives Charles' West Country proposal for Kate.

With the inheritance of a beautiful estate in Herefordshire, Prince William may revive King Charles III's ambition to settle with Kate Middleton in the West Country.

Royal experts told GloucestershireLive that Charles wanted his eldest son to renovate the mansion, purchased by the Duchy of Cornwall before William went to university in Scotland, and relocate there with his family.

However, William had other plans and chose to relocate to Windsor Castle with his wife and three children, despite Charles's suggestions.

According to recent sources, the newly appointed Prince of Wales has inherited a 128,000-acre estate valued at almost £1billion.

The next King intended to cut Coronation customs due to Britain's "cost of living crisis."

The Mail reports that next year's royal ceremony will be shortened to one, originally scheduled to last three hours.

From 8,000 to 2000 people attended.

Lt. Col. Anthony Mather stated, "There are roughly 700 peers, well they won't all be there," and continued, "The same with MPs: they won't all be present since he's not being crowned for them." For the sake of the people, he is being crowned.

According to a report, Angelina Jolie claims that Brad Pitt choked one of their children.

Angelina Jolie has revealed new information about the abuse she and her children endured at the hands of her ex-husband, Brad Pitt. The 47-year-old actress claimed that Pitt, 58, hit and choked one of their children during a private jet ride in 2016, just five days before filing for divorce.

According to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt suffocated one of their children.

Angelina Jolie has revealed new information about the abuse she and her children endured at the hands of Brad Pitt, her ex-husband. On Tuesday, Jolie's legal team initiated litigation about the couple's dispute over their French winery.

It has been reported that five days before filing for divorce, the 47-year-old actress accused Pitt, 58, of hitting and choking both of their children on a private jet in 2016.

USA Today reports that the assault allegations surfaced shortly after the flight but that until recently, information surrounding the charges had been kept secret in divorce documents.

FBI and LA County Department of Children and Family Services found no reason to act against Pitt. Pitt was never arrested for the alleged plane incident.

Jolie's legal team says that following an argument at the couple's Chateau Miraval property in France, Pitt grabbed the actress by the head and shook her before shoving her into the toilet wall.

According to reports, Pitt "lunged at his child and Jolie pulled him from behind to stop him" after a child protected Jolie from Pitt's remarks.

After Jolie was injured in the back and elbow when Pitt "threw himself backward into the airplane seats," "that's what the suit is adding.

"Children ran in and bravely tried to shield one another. Pitt struck one of the kids in the face and choked the other. Children were begging Pitt to stop and he ignored their pleas. Each was scared. "The case remains ongoing," many wept.

Jolie reportedly claimed that Pitt spilled beer on her and red wine on the kids at separate times.

After deplaning, Pitt allegedly grabbed Jolie by the head and shoulders and physically attacked one of their children.

According to experts, the new portrait of Meghan and Harry is an insult to the royal family.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's new photographs allegedly humiliated the royal family.

Conflict at the Portrait Gallery.

In an exclusive interview with Page Six, author Tom Bower of "Revenge: Meghan, Harry, and the War Between the Windsors" said he "definitely" believes the Duke and Duchess of Sussex shared their most recent photographs to embarrass the royal family.

He explained that everything up until this point had been done "to establish Brand Meghan and the book, the Netflix series, the podcast." It's all about the bottom line. Moreover, they benefited from being filmed every day for at least seven days before the burial.

A few months previously, the couple was barely visible at the Queen's Platinum Jubilee celebrations, according to Bower's account.

He made this comparison by saying that in contrast to Queen Elizabeth II's burial, where "they were centre stage," here "they were dragged off to a window upstairs and hardly seen."

Bower continued, "You know, she has really got one interest, and that's Meghan, and the casualties are the royal family and as far as she's concerned, that's amazing."

Photos taken by Misan Harriman during Markle and Harry's visit to the UK on the eve of the Queen's death on September 8 were released on Monday. They joined hands and posed for a shot just before the @OneYoungWorld opened to the public.

A fresh photograph of King Charles III, the Queen Consort, Prince William, and Kate Middleton was released two days earlier.

Two days prior, the Palace had released a portrait of the future king and Queen with their heir, Prince William and his bride, Kate Middleton.

The amazingly at ease portrait was taken on September 18, the day before the Queen's burial, in preparation for the massive reception the Palace held for Heads of State and Official Overseas Guests.

The couple was onstage at the Queen's funeral.

Markle and Harry wed in 2018, and less than two years later, they stepped down from their royal duties after reports surfaced that the former actress and their children had been the targets of racial profiling.

As time passed, the family packed up and headed west, settling in California with their two children, Archie (then three) and Lilibet (then one).

Prince William is reportedly "furious" over Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Attempting to mend fences with his estranged sibling, Prince William went out to Harry, often known as "Harry.

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, allegedly turned down his brother Prince William's offer of a private meeting to mend their breach.

According to royal historian Valentine Low's book Courtiers: The Hidden Power Behind the Crown, Prince William went out to Prince Harry after the latter said in an interview that he and William had fallen out months before Megxit.

Although Harry and Meghan's statements to Tom Bradby in 2019 had Prince William 'furious,' the Prince of Wales sought out the Duke for a covert meeting to repair the split, but the Duke declined.

According to the Daily Mail, Valentine says, "The day after the documentary aired, William WhatsApped his brother to beg if he might come and visit him.

Harry and Meghan were utterly taken aback by this. So, what should they do?

As the story goes, Harry was initially on board. Then he had another talk with his sibling, asking who he intended to inform. William said he would have to inform his secretary to clear his schedule. Don't come, Harry warned him then.

Instead of seeing his brother, he decided not to go because he feared William's staff would tell the press about it.

Biographer for the royal family defends Camilla, queen, and condemns The Crown for its "awful" representation of the monarchy.

As Angela Levin says, "I loathed what Harry was now doing and saying about her."

Author Angela Levin, who specializes in the British royal family, has stated that Camilla, Queen Consort, is a hardworking royal who is not at all how she is portrayed in the Netflix series The Crown.

This expert on the royal family has just released a biography of Camilla to dispel myths and correct misconceptions about the Queen Consort.

Angela claims that Camilla was portrayed in a "bad light" on The Crown, a Netflix royal drama. Instead, she is a hard worker behind the scenes for the royal family, as described in the book.

In an interview with Sky News Australia, Angela Levin said, "My motive for doing it was that I dislike The Crown on Netflix because they depicted her in a bad light." What Harry was saying and doing to her at this point bothered me.

I spent 15 months with the prince and authored his biography [Harry: Conversations with the Prince] in 2018. Therefore I consider myself an expert on him. Then, he was entertaining and endearing. However, he has become rather combative recently.

And I just wanted to serve it up and talk to the people in charge of the big charities," Ms. Levin explained.

The royal couple cut the ribbon, said, "how are you," and left. Without a doubt, she is not that. What she's done for people is quite remarkable, as I learned from one of the stories I heard. Her efforts to effect change are sincere.

"And this has stood out during the pandemic when she felt herself that couple who were together, who didn't get on, possibly were having a very hard time because we couldn't go out," she said.

And I wanted to put it to those who call her a rottweiler and the most terrible lady on Earth, that was before she married King Charles," she continued.

And then she made strenuous efforts to assist in securing it. She proposed placing a device in drugstores labelled with a phone number and a person's name (I think it was named Sue or something like that) so customers could place requests for specific individuals. And they'd know you were experiencing problems with your boyfriend attacking or battering you.

And you know, lovely stuff like that," Levin said in conclusion. But she isn't the type to brag, "Look at me; I'm terrific!" She prefers to labour in the shadows, but she's diligent.